,

COSMIQ Research · Study #2 trend

College Completion Over Time

How four-year state completion summaries changed across comparable IPEDS vintages.

Comparison: IPEDS 2021 → 2022; 51 of 51 state groups have a mean in both snapshots.

A single completion snapshot tells us where states stood in one cohort. This view keeps the same definition from Study #2 and applies it independently to each available IPEDS vintage, so readers can see whether a state's descriptive four-year institution average is improving, flat, or worsening. A change is labeled flat when it is smaller than half a percentage point; that threshold avoids treating one-decimal rounding as a meaningful trend.

State completion summaries over time

Mean completion is an unweighted average across qualifying four-year institutions. The coverage line under each value shows how many institutions met the 30-student cohort floor out of all four-year institutions in that vintage. A dash means IPEDS did not report a usable value for that state/vintage; “not comparable” is never treated as zero.

StateIPEDS 2021
mean · coverage
IPEDS 2022
mean · coverage
Change
Alaska 32.5%
4 qualifying / 6 four-year
34.8%
4 qualifying / 6 four-year
+2.3 pts · improving
Alabama 49.9%
24 qualifying / 32 four-year
50.7%
25 qualifying / 32 four-year
+0.8 pts · improving
Arkansas 45.5%
22 qualifying / 26 four-year
45.9%
23 qualifying / 28 four-year
+0.4 pts · flat
Arizona 54.7%
7 qualifying / 16 four-year
45.8%
8 qualifying / 17 four-year
-8.9 pts · worsening
California 62.2%
107 qualifying / 210 four-year
61.2%
110 qualifying / 209 four-year
-1.0 pts · worsening
Colorado 47.7%
26 qualifying / 32 four-year
48.6%
27 qualifying / 32 four-year
+0.9 pts · improving
Connecticut 67.2%
24 qualifying / 28 four-year
66.2%
24 qualifying / 28 four-year
-1.0 pts · worsening
District of Columbia 65.4%
8 qualifying / 14 four-year
65.5%
8 qualifying / 14 four-year
+0.1 pts · flat
Delaware 46.4%
5 qualifying / 6 four-year
43.8%
5 qualifying / 5 four-year
-2.6 pts · worsening
Florida 51.7%
75 qualifying / 97 four-year
51.1%
75 qualifying / 98 four-year
-0.6 pts · worsening
Georgia 44.1%
54 qualifying / 60 four-year
43.3%
53 qualifying / 62 four-year
-0.8 pts · worsening
Hawaii 48.7%
7 qualifying / 8 four-year
47.4%
7 qualifying / 8 four-year
-1.3 pts · worsening
Iowa 60.5%
28 qualifying / 36 four-year
61.0%
28 qualifying / 36 four-year
+0.5 pts · improving
Idaho 52.5%
10 qualifying / 10 four-year
54.4%
9 qualifying / 10 four-year
+1.9 pts · improving
Illinois 57.4%
56 qualifying / 89 four-year
57.6%
55 qualifying / 89 four-year
+0.2 pts · flat
Indiana 57.5%
44 qualifying / 56 four-year
58.0%
44 qualifying / 57 four-year
+0.5 pts · improving
Kansas 45.2%
28 qualifying / 32 four-year
46.8%
27 qualifying / 33 four-year
+1.6 pts · improving
Kentucky 48.9%
28 qualifying / 34 four-year
50.1%
28 qualifying / 34 four-year
+1.2 pts · improving
Louisiana 45.9%
24 qualifying / 30 four-year
46.8%
24 qualifying / 32 four-year
+0.9 pts · improving
Massachusetts 69.4%
65 qualifying / 86 four-year
68.0%
66 qualifying / 86 four-year
-1.4 pts · worsening
Maryland 60.3%
27 qualifying / 33 four-year
59.2%
27 qualifying / 33 four-year
-1.1 pts · worsening
Maine 57.5%
17 qualifying / 20 four-year
61.6%
11 qualifying / 12 four-year
+4.1 pts · improving
Michigan 55.0%
49 qualifying / 60 four-year
55.2%
46 qualifying / 60 four-year
+0.2 pts · flat
Minnesota 64.0%
37 qualifying / 45 four-year
64.1%
37 qualifying / 46 four-year
+0.1 pts · flat
Missouri 52.6%
44 qualifying / 65 four-year
54.2%
47 qualifying / 69 four-year
+1.6 pts · improving
Mississippi 45.1%
15 qualifying / 17 four-year
45.8%
15 qualifying / 17 four-year
+0.7 pts · improving
Montana 45.2%
11 qualifying / 14 four-year
42.1%
13 qualifying / 15 four-year
-3.1 pts · worsening
North Carolina 53.3%
52 qualifying / 66 four-year
52.6%
54 qualifying / 66 four-year
-0.7 pts · worsening
North Dakota 41.4%
14 qualifying / 14 four-year
45.3%
14 qualifying / 14 four-year
+3.9 pts · improving
Nebraska 57.5%
18 qualifying / 22 four-year
57.2%
19 qualifying / 22 four-year
-0.3 pts · flat
New Hampshire 57.3%
12 qualifying / 16 four-year
56.8%
12 qualifying / 16 four-year
-0.5 pts · worsening
New Jersey 61.3%
31 qualifying / 55 four-year
60.7%
31 qualifying / 55 four-year
-0.6 pts · worsening
New Mexico 39.1%
11 qualifying / 12 four-year
38.8%
11 qualifying / 12 four-year
-0.3 pts · flat
Nevada 38.0%
7 qualifying / 11 four-year
39.7%
7 qualifying / 11 four-year
+1.7 pts · improving
New York 60.6%
143 qualifying / 221 four-year
58.8%
147 qualifying / 226 four-year
-1.8 pts · worsening
Ohio 47.1%
94 qualifying / 111 four-year
47.3%
94 qualifying / 113 four-year
+0.2 pts · flat
Oklahoma 39.2%
26 qualifying / 30 four-year
37.5%
26 qualifying / 30 four-year
-1.7 pts · worsening
Oregon 59.5%
19 qualifying / 32 four-year
61.6%
20 qualifying / 29 four-year
+2.1 pts · improving
Pennsylvania 64.3%
98 qualifying / 129 four-year
57.1%
122 qualifying / 144 four-year
-7.2 pts · worsening
Rhode Island 72.3%
10 qualifying / 13 four-year
72.4%
10 qualifying / 13 four-year
+0.1 pts · flat
South Carolina 49.1%
36 qualifying / 39 four-year
48.8%
35 qualifying / 38 four-year
-0.3 pts · flat
South Dakota 49.7%
12 qualifying / 15 four-year
48.9%
12 qualifying / 16 four-year
-0.8 pts · worsening
Tennessee 54.7%
38 qualifying / 51 four-year
53.8%
37 qualifying / 51 four-year
-0.9 pts · worsening
Texas 45.0%
94 qualifying / 126 four-year
44.9%
94 qualifying / 128 four-year
-0.1 pts · flat
Utah 50.0%
11 qualifying / 12 four-year
52.5%
11 qualifying / 12 four-year
+2.5 pts · improving
Virginia 62.0%
41 qualifying / 55 four-year
58.7%
42 qualifying / 56 four-year
-3.3 pts · worsening
Vermont 61.8%
10 qualifying / 15 four-year
63.5%
8 qualifying / 15 four-year
+1.7 pts · improving
Washington 47.5%
51 qualifying / 60 four-year
46.8%
51 qualifying / 60 four-year
-0.7 pts · worsening
Wisconsin 58.4%
37 qualifying / 49 four-year
56.8%
38 qualifying / 49 four-year
-1.6 pts · worsening
West Virginia 44.6%
19 qualifying / 23 four-year
44.1%
18 qualifying / 22 four-year
-0.5 pts · worsening
Wyoming 41.0%
5 qualifying / 5 four-year
41.6%
5 qualifying / 5 four-year
+0.6 pts · improving

Download trend CSV Download trend JSON

Snapshot provenance and scope

  1. IPEDS 2021retrieved 2026-08-30T14:05:03.873Z · 2,344 four-year institutions in scope · 440 missing/suppressed rates · 50 ranked state groups
  2. IPEDS 2022retrieved 2026-08-06T21:41:25.672Z · 2,371 four-year institutions in scope · 436 missing/suppressed rates · 50 ranked state groups

Each snapshot is also preserved at institution level. These links make it possible to audit a state change, including institutions that entered or left the active directory and rates that were missing or suppressed:

Methodology and limitations

  • Same rule in every vintage: include active, degree-granting public and private-nonprofit IPEDS institutions; exclude for-profit institutions and administrative-only units. State summaries use four-year institutions only.
  • Cohort and ranking coverage: an institution contributes to a state mean only when its 150%-time completion rate is reported and its adjusted cohort has at least 30 students. A state is rankable only with at least five such institutions. The trend table shows all state groups, including those that are information-only.
  • Vintage changes are visible: directory membership, reporting counts, qualifying counts, and cohort totals are included for every vintage in the trend CSV/JSON and in each institution-level snapshot. A state’s change can reflect institution-scope or reporting changes as well as actual completion differences; it is not a causal estimate.
  • Missing values stay missing: suppressed or absent IPEDS rates are represented as null in JSON, blank in CSV, and “—” on this page. No rate is imputed, and a missing endpoint is not interpreted as a decline.
  • Retrieval timestamps: every snapshot records its IPEDS vintage and successful source retrieval timestamp. The source data portal and the raw institution rows are provided in the downloads for independent checking.

These are descriptive institution-level summaries, not official state accountability ratings. Differences in admissions, student populations, program mix, transfer patterns, and institution coverage can all affect the comparison.

← Back to Study #2